May 5, 2026

S4E8: Change in Motion with Jennifer Motles

S4E8: Change in Motion with Jennifer Motles

In this episode of Sustainability Forward, we speak with Jennifer Motles, Chief Sustainability Officer at Philip Morris International, about what sustainability leadership looks like inside a complex global business undergoing transformation.

Jennifer shares her journey into sustainability leadership and explains how she sees the role of a CSO: not as a side function, but as a driver of long-term value creation, resilience, and business transformation. The conversation explores why sustainability must start with a company’s most material impacts, how systems change requires action far beyond one company alone, and why transformation should be understood not as a project with a clear end point, but as continuous “change in motion.”

We also discuss what it takes to drive change across a large organisation, how senior leadership alignment shapes progress, and why credibility comes from outcomes, evidence, and transparency around both achievements and limitations. Jennifer offers a candid perspective on trade-offs, accountability, and the realities of working on difficult sustainability challenges where change is often slower and messier than outside observers expect.

This episode will be especially relevant for sustainability professionals, business leaders, and anyone interested in how real transformation happens inside large organisations.

Topics covered:

  • Jennifer Motles’ journey into sustainability leadership

  • Why sustainability matters in the context of business transformation

  • Systems change and the role of business in tackling complex challenges

  • How to drive change across strategy, operations, and leadership

  • Credibility, accountability, and evidence in sustainability

  • Why transparency about trade-offs and limitations matters

  • Advice for people trying to create meaningful change inside complex organisations

A thoughtful episode on leadership, realism, and why the hard work of sustainability happens from within.

1
00:00:03,120 --> 00:00:06,600
This is sustainability forward
with Rishi and Carmini.

2
00:00:09,360 --> 00:00:12,160
Hello, and welcome to
Sustainability Forward, the

3
00:00:12,320 --> 00:00:17,240
podcast where we review multiple
aspects of sustainability and

4
00:00:17,240 --> 00:00:20,560
specifically, we try to
understand how sustainability is

5
00:00:20,560 --> 00:00:25,040
being shaped inside business,
inside industry, as well as how

6
00:00:25,040 --> 00:00:28,600
sustainability is impacting
leadership and leadership

7
00:00:28,600 --> 00:00:30,680
styles.
I'm your host, Richie.

8
00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:35,720
And I'm Carmine, so to this
conversation sits right an

9
00:00:35,720 --> 00:00:39,000
intersection of complexity,
transformation, and leadership.

10
00:00:40,960 --> 00:00:45,360
So sustainability is easy to
discuss in simple settings.

11
00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:48,640
We've all done talked about
sustainability in multiple ways.

12
00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:52,080
It becomes much more
interesting, we think when you

13
00:00:52,080 --> 00:00:56,240
compare how companies are
thinking about it, how they're

14
00:00:56,240 --> 00:01:00,960
going into the deeper questions
about change, about scrutiny,

15
00:01:01,320 --> 00:01:05,200
long term value creation and and
many other surrounding aspects.

16
00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:10,600
And that is exactly what today's
guest brings, which is basically

17
00:01:10,600 --> 00:01:14,960
a very distinct perspective on
sustainability to our episode on

18
00:01:14,960 --> 00:01:20,000
sustainability forward.
So today we are very delighted

19
00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:24,400
to welcome Jennifer Motels.
And Jennifer joined Philip

20
00:01:24,400 --> 00:01:29,720
Morris International PMI in 2015
and has served as the company's

21
00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:33,080
Chief Sustainability Officer
since October 2020.

22
00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:37,920
In this role, she leads PMI
sustainability agenda as core

23
00:01:37,920 --> 00:01:41,000
driver of business strategy and
long term value creation.

24
00:01:41,480 --> 00:01:45,080
She overseas the design and
deployment of PMI Value Plan

25
00:01:45,080 --> 00:01:49,400
2030 Plus grounded in a double
materiality assessment and

26
00:01:49,400 --> 00:01:53,560
structure around six strategic
priorities consumers,

27
00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:57,960
circularity on workforce,
workers in the value chain,

28
00:01:58,400 --> 00:02:02,280
climate and nature.
A leadership is central to our.

29
00:02:02,280 --> 00:02:06,480
PMI embeds sustainability into
its long term business strategy,

30
00:02:06,920 --> 00:02:10,560
driving sustainable sustainable
business to value creation.

31
00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:15,960
During a Turner at PMI, Jennifer
has played a pivotal role in

32
00:02:15,960 --> 00:02:19,120
shaping the company's Statement
of Purpose and expanding

33
00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:22,080
sustainability strategy through
Value Plan 2030.

34
00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:26,320
Plus, Jennifer rolls a junior
doctor, Judy's daughter, degree

35
00:02:26,320 --> 00:02:30,680
from Universidad de Chile,
Escuela de de Reggio, and a

36
00:02:30,680 --> 00:02:33,840
Master of Law's degree from
University of California,

37
00:02:34,120 --> 00:02:37,200
Berkeley School of Law.
Jennifer, welcome to

38
00:02:37,200 --> 00:02:39,960
Sustainability Forward.
Thank you for having me.

39
00:02:39,960 --> 00:02:41,480
It's my pleasure to be here
today.

40
00:02:42,480 --> 00:02:46,200
Thank you, Jennifer.
So to start with, Jennifer,

41
00:02:47,280 --> 00:02:50,640
maybe tell us a little bit about
your own journey and what

42
00:02:50,640 --> 00:02:53,000
brought you into sustainability
leadership.

43
00:02:53,120 --> 00:02:58,000
Our audience is very curious
about these things, so it would

44
00:02:58,000 --> 00:03:00,680
be great to learn about your
journey into sustainability

45
00:03:00,680 --> 00:03:03,040
leadership.
Woof.

46
00:03:03,080 --> 00:03:05,640
It's a it's a difficult question
to summarize.

47
00:03:05,640 --> 00:03:08,840
I will try my best.
You tell me how I do I.

48
00:03:09,880 --> 00:03:15,080
So I been in this role as Chief
Sustainability officer of PMI

49
00:03:15,080 --> 00:03:19,520
for five years now.
I joined the company 10 years

50
00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:21,080
ago.
Now I'm going to turn 11.

51
00:03:21,640 --> 00:03:27,240
And it was always I like to say
in one way or another working in

52
00:03:27,240 --> 00:03:30,400
sustainability even though
sustainability did not exist as

53
00:03:30,400 --> 00:03:35,320
such at PMI back then in 2015.
And frankly, I don't think

54
00:03:35,320 --> 00:03:40,000
sustainability existed in the
world in any corporation in the

55
00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:42,840
way that we understand it in
2015.

56
00:03:43,280 --> 00:03:50,320
But in terms of my values and
the way that I understood what

57
00:03:50,320 --> 00:03:54,600
businesses can do for society
and in what context they exist,

58
00:03:54,720 --> 00:03:58,320
I think that I was always
working in one way or another on

59
00:03:58,320 --> 00:04:02,440
sustainability.
My background is, as you said

60
00:04:02,440 --> 00:04:05,560
before, I'm a lawyer.
I specialize in international

61
00:04:05,560 --> 00:04:10,400
law and human rights.
And so I always had this feeling

62
00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:14,520
and this belief really that
businesses can do so much more

63
00:04:14,520 --> 00:04:18,680
than just serve their
shareholders and generate

64
00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:20,920
profit.
I think that business can be a

65
00:04:20,920 --> 00:04:25,160
huge force for good.
And so it was driven by that

66
00:04:25,160 --> 00:04:28,200
belief that I joined this
company and in different

67
00:04:28,200 --> 00:04:31,120
positions in different
capacities eventually go to the

68
00:04:31,120 --> 00:04:35,280
role where I am today.
Interesting, Very very

69
00:04:35,280 --> 00:04:40,200
interesting background.
And let's move then towards this

70
00:04:40,200 --> 00:04:44,560
journey when you join PMI.
So just for our audience, it's a

71
00:04:44,560 --> 00:04:47,520
big company, but can you help us
just to quick summarize what

72
00:04:47,520 --> 00:04:49,560
what you are busy with over
there?

73
00:04:49,600 --> 00:04:53,080
Well, just to describe a little
bit the company and then move

74
00:04:53,080 --> 00:04:56,400
into your role as a Chief
sustainability officer, sure

75
00:04:56,760 --> 00:04:58,800
means in practice in a global
company.

76
00:04:59,040 --> 00:05:01,920
Practice.
So PMI, for those who don't know

77
00:05:01,920 --> 00:05:08,320
it is has been traditionally
known for being a cigar company.

78
00:05:08,440 --> 00:05:11,560
This is historically what made
Philip Morris International

79
00:05:11,560 --> 00:05:14,920
famous.
But I think today that is no

80
00:05:14,920 --> 00:05:16,320
longer the case.
Actually.

81
00:05:16,320 --> 00:05:21,000
The company has been going
through a long journey, very

82
00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:24,840
radical journey of
transformation to no longer base

83
00:05:24,840 --> 00:05:27,400
its success on making or selling
cigarettes.

84
00:05:27,760 --> 00:05:32,760
And so in that context, in that
context of transformation, what

85
00:05:32,760 --> 00:05:36,000
does sustainability mean?
And I think that for a company

86
00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:39,720
like PMI, but frankly, as a case
study, is a beautiful example of

87
00:05:39,760 --> 00:05:44,840
rethinking what is your role in
society with how you operate,

88
00:05:44,840 --> 00:05:49,720
how you define success, what
products do you bring to society

89
00:05:49,720 --> 00:05:54,720
and how are you able to exist
while respecting environmental

90
00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:58,600
and social boundaries.
So what is my job as CSO?

91
00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:02,160
This is what you ask me in this
company and in the way that we

92
00:06:02,160 --> 00:06:06,920
understand sustainability, is
how to think about this company

93
00:06:07,240 --> 00:06:10,600
to be successful today, but also
to be successful in the long

94
00:06:10,600 --> 00:06:12,880
term.
Understanding that many things

95
00:06:12,880 --> 00:06:16,520
are outside of our control and
will change, and that we have

96
00:06:16,960 --> 00:06:21,040
the opportunity, but also the
duty to build resilience, to

97
00:06:21,040 --> 00:06:26,520
adapt, to ensure that we are
complying with what regulation

98
00:06:26,520 --> 00:06:31,240
is coming to mitigate risk and
to understand technology as a

99
00:06:31,280 --> 00:06:35,240
huge opportunity for innovation
and growth so that we can bring

100
00:06:35,680 --> 00:06:37,760
more value to society and the
planet.

101
00:06:39,760 --> 00:06:45,360
Very interesting, Jennifer.
Both of us, Carmen and I come

102
00:06:45,360 --> 00:06:51,360
from the energy industry
background and, and when we say

103
00:06:51,360 --> 00:06:55,080
energy or sustainability in the
energy industry context, we can

104
00:06:55,080 --> 00:06:58,760
identify exactly why, right.
In the production of fuels,

105
00:06:59,280 --> 00:07:02,640
typically you emit a lot and
then the fuels themselves also

106
00:07:02,920 --> 00:07:06,960
emit a lot, right, which both
need to therefore be abated in

107
00:07:06,960 --> 00:07:10,320
some way.
One of the questions that many

108
00:07:10,320 --> 00:07:15,320
of our listeners might be asking
is why does a company like PMI

109
00:07:15,320 --> 00:07:19,600
care about sustainability?
You know, all of us probably

110
00:07:19,600 --> 00:07:22,920
know the the most famous brands
that the, that the company has,

111
00:07:22,920 --> 00:07:26,040
but but why does it care about
sustainability?

112
00:07:26,040 --> 00:07:28,680
And you said, you know the
change, this change a few years

113
00:07:28,680 --> 00:07:30,600
ago.
What brought about that change?

114
00:07:31,960 --> 00:07:34,920
It's a great question and I love
it that you phrase it in the

115
00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:39,480
context of energy because what
you're hinting there is that

116
00:07:39,480 --> 00:07:41,440
transition, right?
You're talking about.

117
00:07:41,480 --> 00:07:44,400
You actually said it.
You said this need to abate,

118
00:07:44,800 --> 00:07:49,440
this need to understand, account
and recognize the impacts of

119
00:07:49,440 --> 00:07:54,840
what is being produced and then
the impacts of what is that

120
00:07:54,840 --> 00:07:57,040
production having when it's
being used.

121
00:07:57,600 --> 00:08:01,600
And there is this fundamental
need in the energy sector, even

122
00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:06,920
though I don't work there, to
think about how success looks

123
00:08:06,920 --> 00:08:10,520
like in the future without
having such a negative impact on

124
00:08:10,520 --> 00:08:12,480
the planet, particularly on the
environment.

125
00:08:12,920 --> 00:08:18,280
And there are for sure parallels
that you can draw with the

126
00:08:18,280 --> 00:08:21,400
tobacco industry or particularly
with PMI, because this is what

127
00:08:21,520 --> 00:08:25,440
makes PMI so unique.
This deep acknowledgement that

128
00:08:25,640 --> 00:08:31,120
the company had basic success on
a legacy product that was very

129
00:08:31,120 --> 00:08:33,440
harmful to the health of the
consumers.

130
00:08:33,799 --> 00:08:38,320
And that it decided not because
it became mandatory, but because

131
00:08:38,320 --> 00:08:43,600
we believed it was our duty to
invest in R&D to 1st, understand

132
00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:46,280
where the harms of smoking are
coming from.

133
00:08:46,520 --> 00:08:52,000
And secondly, understand how can
we avoid or reduce significantly

134
00:08:52,000 --> 00:08:55,880
those harms by developing and
commercializing better

135
00:08:55,880 --> 00:08:57,720
alternatives than continue
smoking.

136
00:08:58,440 --> 00:09:00,880
And I should be clear here,
because it's not like PMI is

137
00:09:00,880 --> 00:09:04,560
shifting to a place where it's
selling products that are risk

138
00:09:04,560 --> 00:09:07,080
free or healthy, right?
That's not the case.

139
00:09:07,280 --> 00:09:11,520
What PMI is doing is to
understanding consumer behaviour

140
00:09:11,520 --> 00:09:15,080
very well, understanding also
very well where the harms of

141
00:09:15,080 --> 00:09:19,160
smoking are coming from, the
investing in R&D to have better

142
00:09:19,160 --> 00:09:21,040
alternatives to continue
smoking.

143
00:09:21,480 --> 00:09:25,640
And the thing that that might
surprise you that most people

144
00:09:25,640 --> 00:09:29,320
don't know is that there's over
a billion people smoking

145
00:09:29,320 --> 00:09:31,520
cigarettes in the world.
These are not my numbers.

146
00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:34,720
These are WHO numbers.
And importantly, these were the

147
00:09:34,720 --> 00:09:36,960
numbers when I joined PMI in
2015.

148
00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:39,760
And these were the projections
to 2025.

149
00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:44,040
There was AW Cho report
published then that said the

150
00:09:44,040 --> 00:09:46,800
number of smokers is 1.1
billion.

151
00:09:47,560 --> 00:09:52,120
The projections are to remain
steady by 2025, which was the

152
00:09:52,120 --> 00:09:55,440
case.
And now past 2025, the number of

153
00:09:55,440 --> 00:09:59,840
smokers remains the same.
And so that creates a big

154
00:09:59,840 --> 00:10:01,920
fundamental question, what is
happening?

155
00:10:01,920 --> 00:10:07,000
Because if we all know that
smoking is not good, why are

156
00:10:07,000 --> 00:10:09,840
people not smoking less?
And I think it's a combination

157
00:10:09,840 --> 00:10:12,720
of things.
And this brings me to the to the

158
00:10:12,720 --> 00:10:16,600
origin of your question, What
does sustainability mean to PMI?

159
00:10:16,600 --> 00:10:19,800
And what is the parallel with
the energy industry when you

160
00:10:19,800 --> 00:10:23,760
want to create a change that is
so complex, like, for example,

161
00:10:23,760 --> 00:10:26,800
transitioning people away from
fossil fuels to alternative

162
00:10:26,800 --> 00:10:31,080
sources of energy, or when you
want people to stop smoking you,

163
00:10:31,280 --> 00:10:35,040
You're really talking about the
need for systems change.

164
00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:39,320
And it's not something that one
company can create in a silo.

165
00:10:39,360 --> 00:10:42,320
It's something that really
requires A paradigm shift.

166
00:10:42,320 --> 00:10:44,760
And all different parts of
society need to work together.

167
00:10:45,040 --> 00:10:48,640
You need the scientific
community, you need a regulation

168
00:10:48,640 --> 00:10:50,760
that can match consumer
behaviour.

169
00:10:50,760 --> 00:10:53,560
You need infrastructure so that
this transition can happen.

170
00:10:54,400 --> 00:10:59,760
You need media, you need
different, you need academia.

171
00:10:59,760 --> 00:11:02,480
And then, of course, you need
business that has us an

172
00:11:02,480 --> 00:11:08,680
important resource of ingenuity
to invest in innovation and find

173
00:11:08,680 --> 00:11:12,160
better alternatives.
And so here is where for me,

174
00:11:12,720 --> 00:11:15,760
what PMI is doing when it comes
to sustainability is so powerful

175
00:11:15,760 --> 00:11:19,800
because it's not like we're
taking sustainability issues

176
00:11:19,800 --> 00:11:23,760
that have become quote, UN
quote, popular, like addressing

177
00:11:23,760 --> 00:11:27,320
climate change or like
addressing human rights, which

178
00:11:27,640 --> 00:11:30,480
by the way, we're doing, and
they're very important.

179
00:11:30,760 --> 00:11:32,600
But this is not the most
material issue.

180
00:11:32,600 --> 00:11:35,760
This is not the biggest negative
externality that we create.

181
00:11:36,040 --> 00:11:38,880
So where is that biggest
negative externality?

182
00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:40,760
It's the health impacts of our
products.

183
00:11:41,240 --> 00:11:45,240
And as you were talking, you
mentioned a few words starting

184
00:11:45,240 --> 00:11:49,640
from system change, Jennifer,
actually probably our probably

185
00:11:49,640 --> 00:11:52,520
first episode, one of the first
episodes we did with Richie in

186
00:11:53,240 --> 00:11:56,800
3-4 years ago was around the
system change importance in

187
00:11:56,800 --> 00:12:02,160
terms of sustainability, right?
Because it's, it's one of the

188
00:12:02,160 --> 00:12:05,680
reason also why we started this
podcast, because we bringing

189
00:12:05,680 --> 00:12:08,000
together, as you mentioned,
people from business, from

190
00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:15,960
academia, policy makers, right?
Consumers, businesses and people

191
00:12:15,960 --> 00:12:17,920
know.
I think that I think that that

192
00:12:17,920 --> 00:12:20,560
is the common denominator when
it comes to sustainability.

193
00:12:20,680 --> 00:12:25,480
So be it climate change, be it
poverty, inequality or smoking,

194
00:12:25,960 --> 00:12:30,280
these are systemic issues.
And so it's it's unrealistic to

195
00:12:30,280 --> 00:12:33,440
expect that one company is going
to fix it by itself.

196
00:12:33,480 --> 00:12:37,040
It's also unrealistic to believe
that the problem can be fixed

197
00:12:37,040 --> 00:12:40,240
without involving businesses.
So how can you create an

198
00:12:40,240 --> 00:12:43,240
environment where really all
different stakeholders from all

199
00:12:43,240 --> 00:12:46,680
different parts, with different
expertise and with different

200
00:12:46,680 --> 00:12:50,920
mandates can come around the
table and together decide how to

201
00:12:50,920 --> 00:12:52,880
change the status quo?
This is what for me is

202
00:12:52,880 --> 00:12:56,000
fascinating.
And you can take this recipe,

203
00:12:56,000 --> 00:13:00,040
let's say this premise and apply
it to any systemic issue.

204
00:13:00,160 --> 00:13:03,160
So if you've been in the energy,
you guys come from the energy

205
00:13:03,480 --> 00:13:06,440
sector and you've been really
focusing about how to tackle

206
00:13:06,440 --> 00:13:10,080
climate change efficiently,
probably you've reached the same

207
00:13:10,080 --> 00:13:13,120
conclusion, right?
It's not just about energy

208
00:13:13,120 --> 00:13:16,720
companies moving away from
fossil fuels or disclosing

209
00:13:16,720 --> 00:13:20,200
information or having the right
kind of regulation that mandates

210
00:13:20,200 --> 00:13:21,840
it.
You also need infrastructure.

211
00:13:21,840 --> 00:13:23,840
You also need to change consumer
demand.

212
00:13:24,040 --> 00:13:25,880
You also need media to
participate.

213
00:13:25,880 --> 00:13:31,560
So it's so complex and so messy
that I think that there's also

214
00:13:31,560 --> 00:13:34,560
an humbling component of
understanding that change really

215
00:13:34,560 --> 00:13:37,160
doesn't happen overnight.
It takes a lot of time to

216
00:13:37,160 --> 00:13:40,080
achieve.
And there is another dimension

217
00:13:40,080 --> 00:13:45,320
that is around timing, right,
sense of urgency.

218
00:13:45,640 --> 00:13:49,720
And you mentioned transformation
and it's a word that keeps

219
00:13:49,720 --> 00:13:52,400
coming.
I see also in the word, in the

220
00:13:52,400 --> 00:13:59,640
work you produce.
I very like much what you had

221
00:13:59,640 --> 00:14:04,080
introduced, the change in motion
argument and now it's linked to

222
00:14:04,080 --> 00:14:06,000
transformation.
A transformation that is not

223
00:14:06,000 --> 00:14:10,920
just a project doesn't ever a
beginning of our end, right,

224
00:14:11,200 --> 00:14:13,800
More a kind of a process.
So can you talk a little bit

225
00:14:13,800 --> 00:14:16,840
about about this, about this?
Sure.

226
00:14:17,280 --> 00:14:19,320
That's really nice and thank you
for asking me about it.

227
00:14:19,320 --> 00:14:23,280
Because indeed the the company
declared this mission, this

228
00:14:23,280 --> 00:14:26,960
purpose about moving away from
cigarettes for the first time

229
00:14:26,960 --> 00:14:30,160
publicly in 2016, so 10 years
ago.

230
00:14:30,560 --> 00:14:33,520
And that transformation is very
much ongoing.

231
00:14:33,520 --> 00:14:37,760
So along the way, I think that
we all realized that a

232
00:14:37,760 --> 00:14:41,080
transformation is a project that
begins and that ends.

233
00:14:41,080 --> 00:14:45,840
But this is not really the the
ethos of what PMI is about.

234
00:14:45,840 --> 00:14:47,720
We are really changing
constantly.

235
00:14:47,720 --> 00:14:52,080
We're changing to adapt to a
world that is changing very fast

236
00:14:52,360 --> 00:14:55,680
to consumer demands that are
changing very fast to policy and

237
00:14:55,680 --> 00:14:57,960
regulation that is evolving very
quickly.

238
00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:03,200
And the, the key to being
successful is to anticipate a

239
00:15:03,200 --> 00:15:07,440
lot of these changes to be able
to keep the pulse on where the

240
00:15:07,440 --> 00:15:10,800
world is going.
And for that you need to be

241
00:15:11,160 --> 00:15:14,520
continuously in motion.
You need to be changing all the

242
00:15:14,520 --> 00:15:16,960
time.
And I think that the companies

243
00:15:16,960 --> 00:15:21,480
that are able to a, accept this
as a reality and BA are

244
00:15:21,480 --> 00:15:25,560
successful at doing it, are the
ones who are going to be around

245
00:15:26,360 --> 00:15:28,680
in the long term.
Otherwise it's not going to work

246
00:15:28,680 --> 00:15:34,640
out.
Now moving from, you know, the

247
00:15:34,920 --> 00:15:37,720
the idea of the vision for
sustainability, why

248
00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:42,000
sustainability is important,
let's focus a little bit on

249
00:15:42,160 --> 00:15:45,800
sustainability leadership.
Our understanding from having

250
00:15:45,800 --> 00:15:48,960
been involved in this kind of
projects is that it it really

251
00:15:48,960 --> 00:15:54,000
requires a lot of coalition
building, but also should I say

252
00:15:54,000 --> 00:15:56,520
the practical approach of of
understanding where the

253
00:15:56,520 --> 00:16:00,760
trade-offs are.
How do you bring kind of

254
00:16:00,760 --> 00:16:05,240
different parts of the
organization behind you in

255
00:16:05,240 --> 00:16:08,320
trying to achieve, you know, the
vision of sustainability for

256
00:16:08,320 --> 00:16:12,320
PMII?
Think that I agree with what

257
00:16:12,320 --> 00:16:17,040
you're saying, but I think that
framing it that way would

258
00:16:17,040 --> 00:16:23,120
already put me in a place of US
against them.

259
00:16:23,280 --> 00:16:27,880
You know, and I, I, I genuinely
don't think that that's the

260
00:16:27,880 --> 00:16:30,480
case.
I think that this only works

261
00:16:30,480 --> 00:16:36,680
when you have the the complete
and genuine endorsement from

262
00:16:36,680 --> 00:16:40,960
senior leadership in our, in my
case from our CEO, from our CFO

263
00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:47,040
and importantly from our board
that believe that accounting for

264
00:16:47,080 --> 00:16:50,400
other forms of capital that are
not just financial capital, like

265
00:16:50,400 --> 00:16:53,600
natural capital, like social
capital, like human capital,

266
00:16:53,960 --> 00:16:57,640
like intellectual capital are as
important as guarding and

267
00:16:57,640 --> 00:16:59,800
preserving and growing our
financial capital.

268
00:16:59,800 --> 00:17:03,280
So the health of our company,
the success of our company does

269
00:17:03,280 --> 00:17:06,240
not rest on just financial
success.

270
00:17:06,240 --> 00:17:10,280
It rests on the healthiness of
the relationships that we have

271
00:17:10,280 --> 00:17:12,720
and how we protect the resources
that we rely on.

272
00:17:13,119 --> 00:17:18,720
And so if you, and by by you, I
mean the leadership of a company

273
00:17:19,280 --> 00:17:23,000
believes this, then ultimately
what you're doing is that you're

274
00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:25,960
putting someone in charge to
execute that, right.

275
00:17:25,960 --> 00:17:30,360
So it's not me versus the
machine trying to build a

276
00:17:30,360 --> 00:17:33,680
coalition.
It's me with a mandate of our

277
00:17:33,680 --> 00:17:38,920
senior leadership developing a
strategy that can successfully

278
00:17:39,160 --> 00:17:43,840
integrate these considerations
so that we can be successful in

279
00:17:43,840 --> 00:17:45,800
the long term.
So what I'm trying to say is

280
00:17:45,800 --> 00:17:52,160
that it all starts by how does
the company understand value

281
00:17:52,160 --> 00:17:55,480
creation.
If if you anyone who's done an

282
00:17:55,480 --> 00:17:58,320
MBA and has gone to Business
School, there's a lot of talk

283
00:17:58,320 --> 00:18:01,040
about creating value and how you
account for it.

284
00:18:01,440 --> 00:18:04,400
And the traditional way of
accounting for value and

285
00:18:04,400 --> 00:18:09,520
creating value and valuing a
company is through financial

286
00:18:09,520 --> 00:18:12,800
capital and how you grow it.
But the truth is that there are

287
00:18:12,800 --> 00:18:16,160
other forms of capital that are
as relevant for the success of

288
00:18:16,160 --> 00:18:18,480
the business.
And these are many of the

289
00:18:18,480 --> 00:18:23,800
capitals that are managed by our
sustainability strategy.

290
00:18:23,800 --> 00:18:27,400
So everything related to the
natural resources that our

291
00:18:27,400 --> 00:18:29,960
company relies on.
In our case, a company that has

292
00:18:30,040 --> 00:18:34,520
a heavy supply chain based on
agriculture, understanding that

293
00:18:34,520 --> 00:18:37,680
we are relying on water, that we
are relying on a tobacco crop,

294
00:18:37,680 --> 00:18:41,280
that we are relying on the
fertility of the soil, that

295
00:18:41,280 --> 00:18:45,600
we're relying on forests and
preserving natural ecosystems

296
00:18:45,600 --> 00:18:48,240
and ensuring that we're
managing, that we're mitigating

297
00:18:48,240 --> 00:18:50,760
the impacts we're creating and
that we're adapting

298
00:18:50,760 --> 00:18:55,280
appropriately.
Again, it's not a as it's not a

299
00:18:55,280 --> 00:18:59,120
me versus them trying to
convince that this is good for

300
00:18:59,120 --> 00:19:03,120
the company.
It's genuinely being business

301
00:19:03,120 --> 00:19:06,400
savvy and understanding that
ultimately this is about

302
00:19:06,400 --> 00:19:10,480
mitigating risk, this is about
complying with regulation that

303
00:19:10,480 --> 00:19:12,520
is on the way or is already
there.

304
00:19:12,880 --> 00:19:16,120
It's about operational
efficiency, it's about resource

305
00:19:16,120 --> 00:19:21,040
optimization, and it's about
investing in innovation and

306
00:19:21,040 --> 00:19:23,480
growth for value creation
ultimately.

307
00:19:23,800 --> 00:19:29,160
So I yeah, when you when you see
it this way, you understand that

308
00:19:29,160 --> 00:19:31,680
it's really one whole
organization growing in that

309
00:19:31,680 --> 00:19:36,560
same direction.
And it takes a lot of courage

310
00:19:36,560 --> 00:19:40,160
also to move everybody in the
same, in the same direction, as

311
00:19:40,160 --> 00:19:41,680
you said, during the same
motion.

312
00:19:42,280 --> 00:19:46,360
Now, how do you think, Jennifer,
about credibility and

313
00:19:46,360 --> 00:19:50,440
accountability in a way that
focuses on outcomes and evidence

314
00:19:50,520 --> 00:19:54,960
rather than labels?
I think that this is really

315
00:19:54,960 --> 00:19:57,600
important.
You were no Rishi was talking

316
00:19:57,600 --> 00:20:01,760
about trade-offs before.
I didn't mention it, but your

317
00:20:01,760 --> 00:20:07,080
question actually ties to that.
I think that everything in life

318
00:20:07,080 --> 00:20:10,520
is about trade-offs, everything
in life is about compromise, not

319
00:20:10,520 --> 00:20:15,560
just sustainability.
And so in an ideal world, things

320
00:20:15,560 --> 00:20:19,120
would function in a specific way
and everybody would be happy.

321
00:20:19,120 --> 00:20:21,920
In an ideal world, cigarettes
wouldn't exist anymore.

322
00:20:22,720 --> 00:20:25,440
In an ideal world, we would we
would have managed to make

323
00:20:25,440 --> 00:20:28,320
cigarettes obsolete.
By the way, PMI is not the only

324
00:20:28,320 --> 00:20:30,680
company that is selling
cigarettes, so it doesn't just

325
00:20:30,680 --> 00:20:35,000
depend on us many years ago, but
it's not as easy.

326
00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:40,640
It's not a straightforward and
understanding how bumpy that

327
00:20:40,640 --> 00:20:44,880
road is and how complex the
journey becomes.

328
00:20:44,880 --> 00:20:51,240
It's a very, very important part
of managing, managing your work,

329
00:20:51,240 --> 00:20:55,080
managing expectations and
understanding success.

330
00:20:55,080 --> 00:20:59,080
So for sure credibility comes
from accountability for saying

331
00:20:59,080 --> 00:21:01,760
this is what I would like to
achieve, this is what I can

332
00:21:01,760 --> 00:21:04,520
control and this is outside of
my control.

333
00:21:04,520 --> 00:21:06,520
This is outside of my sphere of
influence.

334
00:21:06,520 --> 00:21:15,440
And I think that many companies
are very shy about talking about

335
00:21:15,440 --> 00:21:18,360
their limitations.
They, they don't want to talk

336
00:21:18,360 --> 00:21:22,800
about what they're unable to do
because it may, it will make

337
00:21:22,800 --> 00:21:29,480
them look weak or not capable or
not championing enough certain

338
00:21:29,480 --> 00:21:32,200
topics.
I, I fundamentally disagree with

339
00:21:32,200 --> 00:21:35,880
that.
I think that talking about your

340
00:21:35,880 --> 00:21:41,760
sphere of influence shows a very
deep awareness of the complexity

341
00:21:41,760 --> 00:21:43,520
of the issues that you're trying
to tackle.

342
00:21:43,520 --> 00:21:48,000
So what I try to do when we talk
about transformation

343
00:21:48,000 --> 00:21:52,160
particularly but not only any
sustainability issue is to say,

344
00:21:52,440 --> 00:21:56,400
well, we would like to achieve
net 0 by 2014.

345
00:21:56,400 --> 00:21:59,480
We would like to make cigarettes
obsolete.

346
00:21:59,680 --> 00:22:03,080
This is how I will show you that
I want that to happen.

347
00:22:03,360 --> 00:22:07,680
Look at 99% of my Rd. spend
going into this new business.

348
00:22:07,680 --> 00:22:10,240
Look at where my CapEx is going.
Look at my commercial

349
00:22:10,240 --> 00:22:12,200
expenditure.
Look at the transformation of

350
00:22:12,200 --> 00:22:14,240
factories that used to make
cigarettes and not make

351
00:22:14,240 --> 00:22:16,920
cigarettes anymore.
Look at the volume of cigarettes

352
00:22:16,920 --> 00:22:20,600
that we were making, year on
year decreases everything that

353
00:22:20,600 --> 00:22:24,320
is under control, we're
accelerating to the Max, but

354
00:22:24,480 --> 00:22:26,440
some things are outside of our
control.

355
00:22:26,440 --> 00:22:31,640
So if a country regulates to ban
smoke free products and we

356
00:22:31,640 --> 00:22:35,000
cannot sell them, what else are
we going to sell if not?

357
00:22:35,400 --> 00:22:39,040
And so I think that talking
about those problems actually

358
00:22:39,040 --> 00:22:44,440
creates the opportunity for
dialogue to try to understand

359
00:22:44,440 --> 00:22:48,080
back to your point about
credibility, trust,

360
00:22:48,240 --> 00:22:51,680
accountability and trade-offs.
What is it that you can do?

361
00:22:51,680 --> 00:22:55,240
What is it that you cannot do?
And what is the other part

362
00:22:55,400 --> 00:22:58,640
willing to do if they are
serious about achieving that

363
00:22:58,640 --> 00:23:02,200
change?
If I take it out of tobacco and

364
00:23:02,200 --> 00:23:06,360
to energy that you guys are more
familiar with if you think about

365
00:23:06,560 --> 00:23:11,480
reducing fossil fuel
consumption, but you have people

366
00:23:11,480 --> 00:23:14,000
that don't want to.
I'm, I'm giving a very basic,

367
00:23:14,000 --> 00:23:17,200
basic example, but people don't
want to switch to electric

368
00:23:17,200 --> 00:23:20,600
vehicles or cities don't have
the infrastructure to charge

369
00:23:20,600 --> 00:23:23,160
electric vehicles.
The percentage of people

370
00:23:23,160 --> 00:23:27,200
switching to electric vehicles
is going to be significantly

371
00:23:27,200 --> 00:23:31,440
lower than if you equip a city
with the infrastructure for the

372
00:23:31,440 --> 00:23:34,160
transition.
And a company alone, it cannot

373
00:23:34,160 --> 00:23:36,880
do that, right?
So you really need all players

374
00:23:36,880 --> 00:23:40,720
around the table to talk about
what you're willing to do, what

375
00:23:40,720 --> 00:23:43,480
you're not willing to do.
And again, what are the traders?

376
00:23:43,880 --> 00:23:47,240
Where is it that you compromise?
And how does the pace of change

377
00:23:47,240 --> 00:23:51,360
really look like?
Because sometimes we were

378
00:23:51,360 --> 00:23:54,520
talking about courage.
There's also something very

379
00:23:54,520 --> 00:23:57,160
humbling about the pace of
change.

380
00:23:57,160 --> 00:24:00,680
You can accelerate to a degree,
but the pace of change is the

381
00:24:00,680 --> 00:24:03,080
pace of change.
You cannot go faster than where

382
00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:06,040
you can go.
And I'm realizing that also

383
00:24:06,040 --> 00:24:08,520
allows you to manage
expectations in terms of when is

384
00:24:08,520 --> 00:24:12,920
it that we're going to arrive to
that desired outcome.

385
00:24:14,480 --> 00:24:16,440
Excellent.
Jennifer, as we come to the

386
00:24:16,440 --> 00:24:22,400
close of this episode, maybe
let's let's ask you about advice

387
00:24:22,400 --> 00:24:24,800
that you would give to people,
particularly in the

388
00:24:24,800 --> 00:24:29,120
sustainability domain who are
trying to create meaningful

389
00:24:29,120 --> 00:24:32,760
change specifically in large and
complex organizations.

390
00:24:33,840 --> 00:24:36,120
It's a it's a nice question.
Thank you for asking me.

391
00:24:36,440 --> 00:24:44,600
I think that I would say don't
give up, don't lose hope, and

392
00:24:45,480 --> 00:24:49,560
your work matters.
I think that it's easy to go and

393
00:24:49,560 --> 00:24:56,040
work in those places where
things are easy and everything

394
00:24:56,040 --> 00:25:00,680
is flowing because there's no
complications.

395
00:25:00,680 --> 00:25:04,120
It takes a very special kind of
bravery to go into complex and

396
00:25:04,120 --> 00:25:08,440
complicated places and try to
change them.

397
00:25:09,000 --> 00:25:11,800
And for that, kudos to you.
Don't give up.

398
00:25:13,680 --> 00:25:16,080
Good note to end the episode on
Jennifer.

399
00:25:16,080 --> 00:25:18,080
Thank you so much for joining
us.

400
00:25:18,440 --> 00:25:19,720
Thanks to.
You for inviting me?

401
00:25:19,720 --> 00:25:21,040
I really appreciate it.
No.

402
00:25:21,040 --> 00:25:22,800
Thank you.
I mean what I'm taking away from

403
00:25:22,800 --> 00:25:27,000
this episode is that
sustainability narrative or or

404
00:25:27,000 --> 00:25:29,760
leadership is not about easy or
clean answers.

405
00:25:29,760 --> 00:25:33,040
It is about actually doing the
transformation work from within,

406
00:25:33,680 --> 00:25:36,360
making this practical
trade-offs, building credibility

407
00:25:36,360 --> 00:25:40,560
through evidence, and as you
said, you know, staying focused

408
00:25:40,560 --> 00:25:43,920
on long term value creation.
So it's been a great episode on

409
00:25:43,920 --> 00:25:46,080
our side.
Thanks again for being with us,

410
00:25:46,360 --> 00:25:49,040
and thanks to everyone of you
listening to Sustainability

411
00:25:49,040 --> 00:25:51,080
Forward.
You've been listening to

412
00:25:51,080 --> 00:25:55,440
Sustainability Forward.
If you enjoyed this episode,

413
00:25:55,640 --> 00:25:57,880
please follow, share, and
subscribe.

414
00:25:58,720 --> 00:26:02,120
You can find
us@sustainabilityforward.com on

415
00:26:02,120 --> 00:26:06,200
all major podcast platforms and
on LinkedIn under Sustainability

416
00:26:06,200 --> 00:26:07,520
Forward the Podcast.
Jennifer Motles Profile Photo

Chief Sustainability Officer, Philip Morris International

Jennifer Motles joined Philip Morris International (PMI) in 2015 and has served as the company’s Chief Sustainability Officer (CSO) since October 2020. In this role, she leads PMI’s sustainability agenda as a core driver of business strategy and long‑term value creation. She oversees the design and deployment of PMI’s Value Plan 2030+, grounded in a double‑materiality assessment and structured around six strategic priorities: Consumers, Circularity, Own Workforce, Workers in the Value Chain, Climate, and Nature. Her leadership is central to how PMI embeds sustainability into its long‑term business strategy, driving sustainable business through value creation.

During her tenure at PMI, Jennifer has played a pivotal role in shaping the company’s statement of purpose and expanding its sustainability strategy through Value Plan 2030+.

Jennifer holds a Juris Doctor degree from Universidad de Chile—Escuela de Derecho and a Master of Laws degree from University of California, Berkeley School of Law.